Sipu Jha
In 1958, sparrows became a target across China. The order formed part of what was called the Four Pests Campaign. At the time, officials said the birds were eating too much grain. There were warnings from scientists, though they did not carry much weight. A new academic paper returns to that moment and looks at what followed. Drawing on digitised farm records and ecological modelling, the researchers suggest the loss of sparrows may have unsettled more than expected. Crop yields dipped in some areas. Mortality rose during the Great Chinese Famine between 1959 and 1961. The study estimates that close to two million additional deaths could be linked, indirectly, to the eradication effort. The number sits within a much larger tragedy.
China’s sparrow eradication campaign contributed to ecological collapse and famine
The research “CAMPAIGNING FOR EXTINCTION: ERADICATION OF SPARROWS AND THE GREAT FAMINE IN CHINA” compared counties where sparrows were naturally more common with those where they were less suited to the landscape. The differences show up after 1958. Rice output fell by around 5.3 percent more in counties with higher sparrow suitability. Wheat dropped by roughly 8.7 percent more.Both crops grow above the soil and are exposed to insects. Sparrows had fed on some of those insects. Once the birds were gone, insect numbers may have climbed. The paper does not dramatise this point. It simply notes that sweet potatoes, which grow underground, did not decline in the same way. In some places they did slightly better.
Increased food procurement worsened shortages
There was also the matter of grain collection. Procurement targets rose during these years. Officials believed production had improved. In some of the counties most affected by sparrow loss, the opposite appears to have been true.Mortality rates were about 9.6 percent higher in areas with greater sparrow suitability. The worst year was 1960. The study suggests that nearly one-fifth of crop losses during the famine period could be associated with the eradication campaign. It does not claim this was the sole cause. Other factors were already in motion.
Findings highlight risks of ecological disruption
The Great Chinese Famine resulted in tens of millions of deaths. Weather, policy and economic pressure all played a part. This research adds another layer, one tied to ecological balance.Sparrows, the authors argue, acted as a quiet control on insect populations. Removing them shifted something in the fields. The broader point is less about birds alone and more about systems. When one element is taken out, the response is not always immediate or obvious. Sometimes it shows up later, in numbers that are harder to absorb.
English 
हिन्दी