The series might be over, but the show goes on!Yes, we’re talking about ‘Stranger Things’. After ‘One Last Adventure: The Making of Stranger Things 5’, fans lit up the internet with some wild theories — somewhat to compensate their disappointment with the series finale. One particular scene in the documentary got everyone buzzing — some people thought they spotted a ChatGPT tab on a laptop and jumped to the conclusion that Matt and Ross Duffer let AI help write the final season. The rumor spread like wildfire, especially with so much chatter about the finale itself. And now, the documentary’s director is stepping in to clear things up.

All about the rumor: How did it all start

It all started with a quick shot: the Duffer brothers at a laptop, working on the script. Some people saw what looked like a ChatGPT browser tab in the background and shared that discovery online. Suddenly, fans on X (Twitter), other fan forums, and everywhere else were convinced AI had a hand in the finale — and maybe even blamed it for the parts they didn’t like. Posts saying “So they really used ChatGPT for this script?” took off and how. Given how mixed the reaction was to the ending — weighing heavier on the side of disappointment — the idea that AI was behind it just added fuel to the fire. People linked their disappointment directly to the possibility that the writers handed things over to a machine.

The facts behind the speculation: Here’s what the documentary director actually said

After the documentary aired, director Martina Radwan didn’t waste any time addressing the rumors. She was straightforward: there’s zero real evidence that the Duffers used ChatGPT to write the finale. Sure, you might see a bunch of tabs open — research, notes, who knows what else — but that’s just what writers do. As per E! News, Martina told The Hollywood Reporter, “But to me it’s like, doesn’t everybody have it open, to just do quick research?”Radwan even joked about it: “How can you possibly write a storyline with 19 characters and use ChatGPT?” She pointed out that the theory falls apart if you look at how real TV writing works. She revealed, “People think ‘writers room’ means people are sitting there writing,” adding, “No, it’s a creative exchange. It’s story development. And, of course, you go places in your creative mind, and then you come back [to the script].” She even added the analogy (not metaphor), “That’s like having your iPhone next to your computer while you’re writing a story. We just use these tools … while multitasking.”Radwan said it stung to see fans doubting the human side of the show: “What I find heartbreaking is everybody loves the show, and suddenly we need to pick it apart.” She watched the writers argue, brainstorm, and rewrite together — real creative teamwork, not a shortcut for AI. She even said it: “I witnessed creative exchanges. I witnessed conversations.” The rumor, as per her claim, just doesn’t match reality:

Where does the fandom stand now

Let’s be honest — the ChatGPT rumor didn’t pop up out of nowhere. The ‘Stranger Things’ finale split the fanbase, and these outrages — they’re just the cracks showing up. Avid fans argued about everything from character arcs to so-called “Conformity Gate,” a theory that the ending was intentionally misleading just to have a closure that they believed the series deserved. Fans were already dissecting every frame, and when someone posted a screenshot with the ChatGPT tab, it snowballed. But even with all the theories and screenshots flying around, nobody’s shown any proof that AI helped write the show.However, Martina’s comments put things in perspective now. Sure, writers might use AI for research or to kick around ideas. But the finale we watched came from people — real writers, real arguments, real creativity. The documentary even shows the hours of debate and back-and-forth you’d expect from a massive show like this.