During her recent appearance in Logan Paul and Mike Majlak’s IMPAULSIVE podcast, Brianna Chickenfry found herself in the centre of a fresh controversy after she questioned the age of influencer Clavicular and suggested he may have misrepresented himself years earlier. The buzz began when fans connected an old bar security video with his current age, prompting speculation about whether he was underage when working the job.The discussion immediately went viral, and users analyzed trends and security measures of the nightlife. Some of them rejected the assertions on the basis of harmless confusion by other people with some claiming that the math offers valid questions.
Viral clip raises questions about age and bar security rules
During the podcast conversation, Brianna Chickenfry recalled recognizing Clavicular from a past event and expressed doubt about his stated age. She described hosting a bar event in Cape Cod where he worked security and later noticing the clip had resurfaced online.Chickenfry claimed, “He was my security guard three years ago and this video like it went viral and he was a security guard down Cape Cod like I threw an event at a bar and he was our security guard. This is why I think he’s lying about his age. He was literally security guard in 2022, 2023.”She added, “You can’t be a security guard at a bar until how old? To which Logan Paul replied, Yeah, because he’s 20 now allegedly. So that would put him at 17 if you’re saying.”Mike Majlak also added, “Here’s why. Here’s why he’s actually 20 because he can’t, he can’t get into bars and clubs. He’s not old enough. So like that’s like if anything like he’s, he’s, he’s getting mogged by all the security guards at the different entrances. Cause why would he do that, dude? It’s not, he’s not gesture maxing. Like he’s actually getting turned down at these.”Her remarks fueled speculation about whether he could have used a fake ID or whether timelines were simply misremembered. In many U.S. states, bar security staff must meet age requirements tied to alcohol service laws, though policies vary by venue and role.As the clip spreads, the discussion explains the speed at which internet investigations may turn a lighthearted podcast episode into a social media phenomenon. Be it a misconception or a question of conforming to conventional standards, the dialogue highlights the scrutiny that ensues at the height of personalities who have emerged online after her history comes up.





