![\"How](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/thumb\/msid-129898556,imgsize-98856,width-400,resizemode-4\/article-50.jpg\" "\\"<p>Kharg")
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\nUS President Donald Trump\u2019s remarks about potentially seizing Iran\u2019s Kharg Island oil terminal have sharpened focus on the strategic and commercial stakes tied to one of the country\u2019s most critical energy export hubs.Kharg Island, located in the Persian Gulf, serves as Iran\u2019s primary offshore oil export terminal and handles the bulk of its crude shipments to global markets. Any disruption to operations at the facility would have immediate implications for global oil flows, particularly at a time when energy markets are already under strain due to ongoing conflict in the region and heightened risks to maritime trade routes.In an interview with Financial Times published early Monday, Trump had said, \u201cMaybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t,\u201d adding, \u201cWe have a lot of options.\u201d The comments came alongside indications of continued US and Israeli military activity in the region, even as diplomatic channels showed early signs of movement.The geopolitical tensions have already translated into volatility in energy markets. Iran\u2019s control over export infrastructure, combined with its influence over the Strait of Hormuz, a key chokepoint through which a significant share of global oil passes, has raised concerns among traders about potential supply disruptions. Brent crude prices have surged sharply in recent weeks, reflecting fears of a broader supply shock.Kharg Island\u2019s significance lies in its export capacity and as a logistical anchor for Iran\u2019s oil sector. Any escalation affecting the terminal could constrain exports, tighten global supply, and further elevate prices. At the same time, the feasibility of physically securing or controlling the island remains uncertain given its proximity to the Iranian mainland and its exposure to counterstrikes.Trump also suggested that a longer-term presence would be required if such an operation were pursued, saying it \u201cwould mean we had to be there for a while.\u201d Analysts note that beyond military considerations, sustaining operations at a strategic asset like Kharg Island would involve securing shipping lanes, protecting infrastructure, and ensuring uninterrupted loading of crude tankers, all of which are critical to maintaining oil market stability.Roughly 15 miles off Iran\u2019s coast, Kharg Island accounts for about 90 per cent of the country\u2019s crude oil exports, making it a critical node in its energy infrastructure. The island\u2019s deep waters enable large oil tankers to dock, allowing uninterrupted shipment of crude, much of which is bound for China. It also hosts freshwater resources that support thousands of residents and key facilities.Given its central role, any direct strike on Kharg Island could significantly disrupt Iran\u2019s oil exports and tighten global supply. However, analysts note that any attempt to invade and hold the island would expose US forces to heightened risk, placing them closer to Iranian defences compared to the current aerial campaign. <\/p>\n Kharg Island in numbers<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"Kharg](\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/photo\/msid-129898492\/kharg-island-in-numbers.jpg\" "\\"Kharg")
<\/p>\n