‘Bogus challenge’: Priya Kapur tells HC wrong spellings, addresses can’t void Sunjay Kapur’s will; hits back at Karisma Kapoor’s kids | Delhi News


‘Bogus challenge’: Priya Kapur tells HC wrong spellings, addresses can’t void Sunjay Kapur's will; hits back at Karisma Kapoor's kids
During a recent session at the Delhi High Court, Priya, the wife of Sunjay Kapur, firmly rebutted allegations from Karisma Kapoor’s children regarding the authenticity of his will. Her attorney highlighted that minor discrepancies, such as typos or incorrect addresses, do not render a will null and void, especially when the signatures in question are unimpeachable.

NEW DELHI: Calling it a “bogus challenge” to the will of late businessman Sunjay Kapur, his wife Priya on Wednesday told Delhi high court that incorrect spellings or addresses can’t be grounds to invalidate the document.Rebutting the allegations levelled by Kapur’s ex-wife and actor Karisma Kapoor‘s children that the will was forged, Priya’s counsel, senior advocate Rajiv Nayyar, told the court that no one had disputed or denied Sunjay’s signatures or those of the other two witnesses.The only ground to challenge the will, he told Justice Jyoti Singh, was if the deceased was not of sound mind, was under coercion, or was under some inability to execute the will. He told HC there was “nothing unusual in the bequest” since “in wife vs wife he would obviously name the present wife as beneficiary over an estranged wife”. The plea of the plaintiffs, Samaira and Kiaan Raj, was bereft of any cause of action, he argued.“Now I am told there are four additional grounds to invalidate a will – wrong spelling, wrong address, writing testatrix instead of testator, and closeness of witnesses,” Nayyar said, adding the existence of the will was disclosed to all on July 30.“There were two opportunities for the plaintiff. There was a will reading. It was read out to everyone, including the plaintiff… The suit was filed on Sept 9. There is no reference or challenge to the will in the plaint. The will was shared with them on Sept 15. They were conscious of the existence of the will as far back as July 30, prior to the filing of the suit. Today we are dealing with a non-existent challenge to the will. It’s a bogus challenge,” he said.HC will resume hearing in the matter on Friday.





Source link

  • Related Posts

    “Bring Molly back idiots”: Fans react to the real reason why Molly Qerim walked away from ESPN’s First Take | NFL News

    Molly Qerim’s exit from ESPN’s First Take has left fans and insiders buzzing. The veteran host’s departure was sudden, but in a recent SI Media Podcast, Chris “Mad Dog” Russo…

    Abujhmarh, N Bastar Naxal-free, says Shah as 170 Reds to surrender today | Raipur News

    Representational image (PTI file photo) RAIPUR/NAGPUR: Chhattisgarh’s Bastar awaits the largest mass surrender of Maoists in its history of Left-wing extremism Friday, with 170 guerrillas lined up to formally lay…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    en_USEnglish